Something that surprised me was that the business was attacked for trying to convert people to Christianity. I could see attacking a business for not following religious law (taxing the poor, for example) but not converting people to Christianity.
Something that confused me was what exactly the attackers thought this business was doing to think they were trying to convert people to Christianity.
Two questions I have are 1. Did the owner think about leaving after this attack or 2. Did he consider changing his practice of what was considered conversion to alleviate misunderstandings?
There is nothing I disagreed with the author about.
No comments:
Post a Comment